Will 25% of 16 Year-olds Really Live to be 100?

Tuesday’s press was full of stories such as this suggesting that one in four current 16 year olds will live to be 100. I was a bit suspicious of this as it doesn’t seem that long since we were being told that current teenagers are an unhealthy bunch who only shift from their xboxes long enough to grab another portion of chips. Also the Government leapt onto the report as justification for hacking away at pension provision.

The claims appear to be based on this. The first thing to be noted is that the writer, James Evans, states clearly that the projections are based on extrapolating current trends and that such projections become increasingly unreliable the further into the future you take them – a caveat I have not noticed in the press coverage.

More seriously, this document includes a chart which shows how life expectancy at birth has increased over the last 60 years and projecting those increases into the future. The chart appears to show the male and female life expectancies at birth in 1951 to be 78 and 83 respectively and the current figures to be 88 and 92 respectively. This is purest bullshit. Further search found this which has a rather small graph which suggests that the 1951 life-expectancies were 65 and 72 respectively. The accompanying text states that the figures of 78 and 83 are expected to be achieved in 2021. Slight descrepancy there.

Here is the text of an email I have sent to Mr Evans:

Dear Mr Evans

I have been looking into the background behind yesterday’s press stories suggesting that 25% of current 16 year olds will live to be 100 and an internet search lead to your document http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd1/adhoc_analysis/2011/centenarians_by_age_groups.pdf

Chart 1 puzzled me as it suggests that in 1951 male life expectancy at birth was 78 and female 83. This seemed somewhat high and further search found http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/rp99/rp99-111.pdf

a graph here suggests that the relevant life expectancies at birth were 65 and 72 respectively and the accompanying text says that the life expectancies of 78 and 83 will be achieved in 2021.

I am not a statistician so I wonder if you could explain this difference and further how the lower figures will change the projected number of centenarians.

Yours sincerely

John Hawcock

I look forward to his reply.

About these ads

Tags: , ,

One Response to “Will 25% of 16 Year-olds Really Live to be 100?”

  1. Sonny Jim Says:

    These people can’t seem to make up their minds. I posted a story just yesterday about a school principal from Chicago who has banned her students from bringing sack lunches from home because they were less healthy than the school lunches. It’s amazing what kind of “facts” surface when someone is trying to justify spending cuts. Wonder what it will be tomorrow.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 158 other followers

%d bloggers like this: