The ‘Health Ranger’ Backtracks (a bit)

[BPSDB]Mike Adams, the self-appointed ‘Health Ranger’ seems to be getting a tad defensive about his anti-sceptic diatribe

For example, he now says:-

Getting back to the skeptics themselves, some of them took my article way too personally, attributing every single statement to themselves. Well of course every single belief in that article isn’t followed by every single “skeptic” person.

It is hardly surprising that sceptics “attribute every single statement to themselves” since every statement began either “skeptics believe” or “skeptics do not believe”. Since he did not qualify these statements by saying some or even many sceptics have the stated beliefs, it is clear he meant “all”.

He then says:-

Even skeptics disagree amongst themselves on how far to take their “skeptic” beliefs.

And here he demonstrates his total lack of understanding as to what scepticism is. Scepticism is not about “belief” but evidence. On some subjects the evidence is not clear-cut, leading to different conclusions. Hence the disagreement amongst sceptics.

It is clear that he regards all opinions as “beliefs” and any which disagree with him are traduced and misinterpreted, which says more about his intellectual processes than it does about his opponents. In his newsletter he says:

Do you know any “skeptics?” They’re an endless source of entertainment. They don’t “believe” in Vitamin C.

There is of course not one sceptic who does not believe in vitamin-C. What there are are people who do not accept the claims that megadoses of vitamin C can treat disease – because there is no evidence to support such claims.

Back to his back-tracking:-

If you, in your own experience, find that herbs and massage therapy and nutrition are all utterly worthless, and you want to join the skeptics camp, then go for it! If you’ve thought about it yourself, and reached your own conclusions, and you’ve pursued truth with an open mind and an open heart, then whatever conclusion you reach is “your” truth.

He concedes here that if you think about the evidence you might come to a different conclusion, though he qualifies that in post-modernist terms by saying that is “your” truth. Therapies work, or they don’t. This can be determined by looking at the evidence. If two people come to different conclusions then either at least one of them has misinterpreted the data or there is insufficient evidence to come to a firm conclusion. I have particular opinions on medicine and health because I think that is the way the evidence points. If you can prove me wrong, I will change my opinion, not continue to insist on “my” truth. That would be simple intellectual dishonesty.

…don’t let your current intellectual position become a prison that prevents you from exploring other possibilities of the way the universe works

Sceptics don’t. That’s what makes them sceptics. Of course, they like to see evidence for these other possibilities.

[Sceptics] also tend to jump to false conclusions about what people are really saying. In my previous article, for example, I never stated whether I believed in God, or whether I was an athiest [sic], or whether I followed organized religion and yet people read the article and they leaped to conclusions, assuming I was promoting organized religion, for example, or that I was condemning atheism.

Since he concluded his diatribe by saying that sceptics do not believe in higher powers or the after-life and are “usually atheists” it is safe to say that he was condemning atheism and endorsing a religious viewpoint. As was his ad-hom attack saying that we are all zombies and mindless drones. Something he is now clearly trying to forget.

He reverts to normal mode in his concluding paragraph with another blanket ad-hom attack on all sceptics:-

The skeptics’ view of the universe is that of a child . Embracing the holistic nature of the universe requires a more mature understanding.

Personally, I think that it is more mature to accept the evidence, rather than stamp your feet and sulk because the universe is not the way you want it to be. And that’s “my truth”.


Tags: , ,

4 Responses to “The ‘Health Ranger’ Backtracks (a bit)”

  1. Dumbass Says:

    I like his qualification that “Well of course every single belief in that article isn’t followed by every single “skeptic” person.”

    Seriously, most of the stuff he wrote isn’t followed by any single “skeptic” at all!

    I’d like him to show just one example of a skeptic who believes that pregnancy is a disease or that people can take an unlimited number of drugs.

    He’s just pulling this stuff out of his ass, and his followers are completely buying it!

  2. jthomas Says:

    What Mike Adams has done is to bring more attention to his fatuous, unsubstantiated claims, and that is good. What can be said about him is not printable but the NN censors have been hard at work deleting comments from those exposing his woo, including mine.

    Eventually he will be run out of business when his true believers see how they have been intellectually fleeced, if not monetarily fleeced.

  3. Dumbass Says:

    > Eventually he will be run out of business when his true believers see how
    > they have been intellectually fleeced, if not monetarily fleeced.

    I think you overestimate his true believers.

    Have you seen some of the comments to his original rant on what skeptics believe? They’ve taken his word on it hook, line, and sinker!

    I enjoyed the one commenter who said “skeptics lack love (as do many people…) and this is good news, because there is hope tht skeptics can reconnect and realize the wrong path they are on”

    It’s like this person saw right into my soul! I lack love and use skepticism to lash out at the world! If only there were someone who could love me and set me on the right path!

  4. cosycrafter Says:

    > Have you seen some of the comments to his original rant on what skeptics believe?

    I think I especially enjoyed the ones that said: ‘everyone should look at life through the eyes of a child. They don’t need to know why everything works…’ have they ever spent time been asked ‘Why?’ repeatedly by a 5 year old? I have and can categorically state that the majority of young children I’ve come across (younger brothers, many, many cousins, nieces and nephews) all want to know about the world they live in.

    An amazing, withering put down my niece (aged 3 or 4) gave me once was when I was pretending that a phone call had come through on her toy phone. She gave me this look and said ‘you do realise that isn’t real, right?’.

    Haha, the magic of kids indeed…exposing the follies of adults 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: